LA 한인회 재판, 판사에게 보낸 마지막 "편지"

사기 변호사 고발 관련 등등 원고인의 입장을 담당 판사에게 전달한 최후의 파일. 판사가 참고할 것인지, 아니면 괘씸죄로 판을 엎을지 예측 불허. 그러나, 판사의 양심을 신뢰하기에 주목한다. 다음 주는 LA 한인회 지난 4년 간 기부금으로 받은 돈 약 140만 달러 중 약 30만 달러 횡령 착복 사기사건을  LA 형사법정에 제기, (하 기환) 피의자를 법정에 세워 공금횡령 사실을 밝힌다.  

Simon Bae, publisher and editor
Korea Unity Press, U.S.A.
3010 Wilshire Blvd.
Los Angeles, California 90010

Telephone: (213) 305-7100

Plaintiff in pro per


SUPERIOR COUNRT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

SIMON BAE; and MEMBERS OF THE KOREAN AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LOS ANGELES, INC. SIMILARLY SITUATED,  Plaintiffs,
vs.
KOREAN AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LOS ANGELES, INC.; KI HWAN HA, and DOES 1 to 50, inclusive,        Defendants

Case No.: BC275912REQUEST FOR CANCELLATION OF JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED AGREEMENT; AND REPORT ON THE ACCUSATION OF ANDREW KIM, ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS FOR ONE TIME BASIS, TO DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE DEPT.: 64JUDGE: Hon. Kenneth R. Freeman

Plaintiff, SIMON BAE, AND MEMBERS OF THE KOREAN AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LOS ANGELES, INC. SIMILARLY SITUATED, file and serve REQUEST FOR CANCELLATION OF OBJECTION TO JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED AGREEMENT; AND REPORT ON THE ACCUSATION OF ANDREW KIM, ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS FOR ONE TIME BASIS, TO DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE as follows.  

I am the plaintiff. One of the issue for plaintiff was the truth for unlawful association, but the judgment was delayed in trial because of dependant’s false statement, therefore the dependant stepped down after 2 years period with cunning trick, but the final issue is asking an additional punishment to dependant who was elected by unlawful association again.
By the way, I am going to state about the fact the judge asked Andrew Kim lawyer who was once hired for the plaintiff and dependant lawyer to sign on the “stipulation”.
At the nighttime of May 11, 2005, Plaintiff heard the story about “the stipulation between two lawyers” from plaintiff’s translator miraculously. It was a shock. This incident happened because Andrew Kim didn’t explain to plaintiff about the stipulation before or after.
In the night of 11th, plaintiff met Andrew Kim to make sure about the truth and stipulation sign and so on, and after doing that; Andrew Kim answered, “I did that because the judge told me to do so.”
Plaintiff believes it’s not true that the judge ordered to sign on the stipulation, but Andrew Kim told the false story to plaintiff.
So, on May 13th, regarding this incident, plaintiff asked the public prosecutor general and the lawyer association to investigate Andrew Kim lawyer who was a lawyer of the plaintiff.
Plaintiff demanded prompt judgment regarding the urgent KAFLA unlawful association, and if possible, requested a public trial instead of judgment delivery by mail, with both dependant and plaintiff in the court so that reporters can confirm.
Plaintiff ’s request is an established fact that illegal punishment of the article of association on 2000, and plaintiff repeatedly insist upon both issue at the same time which are the delay caused by defendant’s false statement on 2004 and additional punishment for Yong Tae Lee who unlawfully elected by unlawful association.
If the charged judge make a written document about this issues or set limits to the only one issue (punishment of dependant Kee Whan Ha), plaintiff will apply preemption of the judge by procedure code. Plaintiff hopes this judgment will be the distinguished one in California history with all America government peoples, Korean community and speech, Korean government, 800,000 Korean residents observing together. Plaintiff mentioned this to dependant lawyer, too.
In the case of dependant lawyers not have a mission on protection of civil right and realization of society justice by <Ethics of Attorneys>, and instead cajole the other lawyer * instigate false evidence * evidence of falsity to be submitted * afflict other people, or using trick and profane to the judge is captured, plaintiff will accuse again to criminal investigation department and lawyer association.

Exhibits:
1.        The joint stipulation signed by judge’s order.
2.        Plaintiff’s Accusation against Attorney Andrew Kim to prosecution.
3.        Newspaper article of Korea Times.

Respectfully submitted.
DATED:  May 16, 2005


By: ______________________________
        Simon Bae
        Plaintiff in pro per

PROOF OF SERVICE


STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

        I am employed in the county of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action.  My business address is, 110 N. Berendo St., Los Angeles, California 90004.

        On May 16, 2005, I served the foregoing documents described as REQUEST FOR CANCELLATION OF JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED AGREEMENT; AND REPORT ON THE ACCUSATION OF ANDREW KIM, ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS FOR ONE TIME BASIS, TO DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE on the interested parties in this action by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed as follows:


Katherine Frenck
Paul, Hasting, Janofsky & Walker, LLP
515 South Flower St., 25th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017



        I caused such envelope to be deposited in the mail at Los Angeles, California.  The envelope was mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid.  I am "readily familiar" with this firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing.  It is deposited with the U.S. postal service on the same day in the ordinary course of business.  I am aware that on a motion by party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after the “date of deposit for mailing" in Affidavit.

        I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

        Executed on May l6, 2005 at Los Angeles, California.




                                                        ___________________
                                                        Martha Jimenez




* 발행인님에 의해서 게시물 이동되었습니다 (2005-12-22 15:03)